Hound Dog LPGA: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

The schedule, the Commish and our outlook

After I posted on yesterday's announcement of the 2009 LPGA schedule, Commissioner Carolyn Bivens took to the podium in West Palm Beach and gave us some details.  Yes, she put the expected positive spin on it, despite the net loss of three events and about $5 million in prize money from 2008's totals.  If you haven't read it yourself, please click on the link and do so - don't rely solely on my interpretation or anybody else's to tell you what her motives or tone or anything else was (or was not).

There.  Now that you've read it yourself, you can either agree or not with me or Ryan Ballengee or The Constructivist or Brent Kelley when each of us puts our own "spin" on the developments.  Mine follows after the jump...

Star-divide

First and foremost - the U.S. economy really sucks right now, and a large portion of the global market seems to be following its lead.  Anybody who thinks a lower-echelon sports league (and make no mistake, that description fits the LPGA) should be expanding in this environment is deluded.  So is the notion that Ms. Commissioner is being foolish in presenting the current situation in a positive light.  Let's leave those misguided perceptions behind and look at the big picture.

Yes, 31 events in 2009 is 9% less than the 34 events in 2008.  It is also 7% MORE than the 29 events that were played to completion in 2007 - 3% more if you insist on including the aborted Arkansas event.  There were 32 events played in 2006 and 31 in 2005.  The vast majority of LPGA seasons have consisted of 28-32 events so <note the bold text please> 34 events in 2008 was the aberration, not the 31 in 2009.  The average purse size has been increasing every year and it will drop slightly next year - by about $3000 per event.  So, tell me again - why is 31 a bad number?

Every single year of the LPGA's history - even through the boom years of Sorenstam, Webb and Pak - has brought a turnover of sponsors and fluctuation in event totals.  It's a process that professional golf tours have always dealt with and survived.  I understand that as respected voices of the golfy interwebs we have the duty to raise concern about the state of the game where we see fit.  But yesterday's announcement had great news - the Corona Championship and Phoenix events will go on, even after we "who know better" had declared them dead.  To continue casting doubts and proclaiming dire straits ahead despite information to the contrary is uncalled for.

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Hound Dog LPGA

No Vacancy

Jul 2009 by hound dog - 5 comments

Bell Micro Moves To April 2010

Mar 2009 by hound dog - 2 comments

2009 LPGA Schedule

Nov 2008 by hound dog - 1 comment

Comments

Display:

It's definitely not all bad

Thanks for the link, first of all. :)

I’m usually really harsh on Biv, but she deserves some credit here. Basically playing for 90% of the purse money as last season is solid. Anyone that is really mad about what they’re getting is in dreamland.

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 20, 2008 9:40 AM PST reply actions  

let's take a look at other women's tours' schedules, too

The JLPGA had several more events than the LPGA in 2008, but my understanding is Ai Miyazato and the other young guns helped rescue a tour that had been foundering despite the legendary performance of Yuri Fudoh. The KLPGA has taken off in the last decade, but still trails far behind the JLPGA and LPGA in #s of events and size of purses. From what I understand, the LET had been growing slowly in recent years…. When they announce their ‘09 schedules, we’ll see what cuts they’ve had to endure (if any). It’ll help put Bivens’s performance in perspective, even if the women’s tours in Korea and Japan are at least as big as the men’s tours there, if not much more popular.

by The Constructivist on Nov 20, 2008 12:06 PM PST reply actions  

Fewer Full-Field Events

What bothers me about the schedules in recent years is the loss of full-field events. An exempt player who doesn’t qualify for any limited field events who plays every tournament they can will only get into about 20 tournaments, and it gets worse every year. I just did a quick look at previous years’ schedules so I could be wrong. I noticed Christina Kim has been able to play 30 weeks this year, so it’s not bad for the upper-echelon players. With obstacles such as the bad economy and the Asian players dominating the leaderboards, I think Bivens has done pretty well.

by jlowroller on Nov 20, 2008 1:05 PM PST reply actions  

quick question

HD, so the official list of winners, purses, and number of events on the stats page at LPGA.com is wrong? I tend to think so, as the last most likely includes team events like the Women’s World Cup, Three-Tour Challenge, and Lexus Cup. It would be nice to have a chart that broke each year down by full-field event, limited-field event, and team event—might help explain why there were 6 years in the 8 between 1994 and 2000 that they list 40 or more events and why they never went under 35 between 1977 and 2002.

by The Constructivist on Nov 20, 2008 1:23 PM PST reply actions  

What economic downturn?

Perhaps they could add an event in Greenville, SC. The economic downturn hasn’t really hit us. Greenville is home to Furman University, which hosted an LPGA Pro-Am for many years.

by Galley on Nov 21, 2008 7:25 AM PST reply actions  

Sounds good

Which thriving company in the area is ready to pony up the sponsorship fee?

by hound dog on Nov 21, 2008 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Hound Dog LPGA! Whether you're a casual follower of women's golf or a longtime fan, drop by often to check out what's new! Contact me directly at hounddog.lpga@yahoo.com
Start posting on Hound Dog LPGA »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

By oversleeping and missing his pro-am tee time at The Barclays, Jim Furyk may have cost himself millions.  (Photo by Andrew Redington/Getty Images)

PGA Tour Suspends Pro-Am Rule That Disqualified Jim Furyk From The Barclays

PARAMUS NJ - AUGUST 29:  Matt Kuchar watches his tee shot on the 18th hole during the final round of The Barclays at the Ridgewood Country Club on August 29 2010 in Paramus New Jersey.  (Photo by Scott Halleran/Getty Images) +9 updates

Barclays, Final Round: Matt Kuchar Wins Playoff After Martin Laird Three-Putts 18

PARAMUS NJ - AUGUST 28:  Martin Laird of Scotland lines up a putt on the 17th green during the third round of The Barclays at the Ridgewood Country Club on August 28 2010 in Paramus New Jersey.  (Photo by Scott Halleran/Getty Images) +3 updates

The Barclays, Round 3: Martin Laird Surges Ahead, Tiger Toils In Irrelevancy

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Hound-large_small hound dog

N9102048_32253009_9304_small jamie.r.saengsawang